How is document review organized in Relativity?

Document review in Relativity is organized with assigned roles and user-defined criteria, which allows for a structured and efficient review process. This approach ensures that each document is reviewed by the appropriate team member based on their designated role, such as reviewer, administrator, or project manager.

User-defined criteria come into play through the use of tags, fields, or workflows that can be customized to meet the specific needs of the project or client. This helps in prioritizing documents, flagging relevant items, and ensuring that the review process is aligned with legal and business requirements. By leveraging assigned roles and criteria, teams can streamline their review efforts, enhance collaboration, and maintain oversight over the review process, ultimately leading to a more thorough and accurate outcome.

In contrast, other methods such as organizing by client preferences or device compatibility may not provide the same level of specificity and control necessary for effective review management. Random selection of documents can lead to inconsistencies and gaps in the review, as it does not take into account the important factors that influence the relevance and importance of the documents being reviewed. Therefore, the structure provided by assigned roles and user-defined criteria is essential for effective document review in Relativity.