What is the review workflow process in Relativity?

The review workflow process in Relativity involves a comprehensive sequence of steps that reviewers systematically follow to examine, tag, and assess documents. This structured approach ensures that reviewers can efficiently and effectively manage large volumes of documents, which is essential in eDiscovery processes. Each step in the workflow is designed to facilitate thorough analysis and consistent documentation of findings, thus supporting compliance and legal standards.

During this process, reviewers can apply various tags to documents, capturing relevant information such as confidentiality, importance, and responsiveness. This tagging not only aids in organizing documents but also assists in generating reports and making informed decisions regarding the case. The workflow is designed to be repeatable and may involve multiple phases, including initial review, quality control, and final approval, ensuring that the documents are adequately scrutinized and categorized.

In contrast, the other options describe isolated aspects that do not encompass the full breadth of the review workflow. For example, a one-time review at the end of a case lacks the systematic nature and iterative checks that are present in a true review workflow. Similarly, methods for grouping documents by relevance or tools for anonymizing sensitive information are auxiliary functions that serve specific purposes but do not represent the comprehensive sequence of activities involved in the review workflow process.